{
  "schema_version": "3.0.8",
  "id": "participation-example-community-moderation-policy-001",
  "version": "3.0.8",
  "last_reviewed_utc": "2026-06-20T17:20:17Z",
  "artifact_maturity": "reference",
  "process_title": "Fictional community review of an AI-assisted moderation policy",
  "decision_scope": "Participants could change disclosure language, temporary-action limits, evidence fields, appeal timing, and the conditions requiring human review. Whether permanent account removal required a human decision was explicitly open.",
  "decision_owner": "Example Community governance working group",
  "participation_level": "co_decision",
  "affected_groups": [
    "community participants",
    "volunteer moderators",
    "people whose posts may be limited",
    "accessibility reviewers"
  ],
  "participant_scope_and_gaps": "This fictional example records four affected groups. It does not claim statistical representation. People without reliable internet access and people requiring additional language support were identified as a gap for the next review cycle.",
  "non_negotiable_constraints": [
    "No publication of private case material",
    "No permanent account removal by an automated system",
    "No inference that silence equals consent"
  ],
  "contribution_channels": [
    {
      "channel": "Accessible public comment form and downloadable offline worksheet",
      "access_supports": [
        "plain-language summary",
        "keyboard-operable form",
        "email alternative",
        "screen-reader labels"
      ],
      "privacy_posture": "Contributors could submit a public comment or a private correction request; public attribution was optional.",
      "compensation_or_cost_support": "No compensation was offered; the record states this limitation."
    },
    {
      "channel": "Facilitated small-group review",
      "access_supports": [
        "agenda in advance",
        "remote attendance",
        "written follow-up"
      ],
      "privacy_posture": "Only summarized, non-identifying notes were published.",
      "compensation_or_cost_support": "Volunteer time was acknowledged; no payment was offered."
    }
  ],
  "contributions": [
    {
      "contribution_id": "C-001",
      "participant_group": "community participants",
      "summary": "Require a human to approve permanent removal and show the appeal path in every consequential notice.",
      "evidence_references": [
        "fictional-session-notes-01"
      ],
      "dissent_or_minority_report": false,
      "disposition": "accepted",
      "disposition_reason": "The change improved contestability and matched the published authority boundary.",
      "resulting_change": "Permanent removal now requires named human review; notices link to the appeal route.",
      "response_owner": "Governance working group"
    },
    {
      "contribution_id": "C-002",
      "participant_group": "volunteer moderators",
      "summary": "Allow a 24-hour automated visibility limit when a post exposes personal contact information.",
      "evidence_references": [
        "fictional-session-notes-02"
      ],
      "dissent_or_minority_report": false,
      "disposition": "partially_accepted",
      "disposition_reason": "A temporary limit was accepted, but it expires after six hours unless a human reviewer renews it.",
      "resulting_change": "The policy records a six-hour maximum, reason code, evidence reference, and human-review queue.",
      "response_owner": "Moderation policy editor"
    },
    {
      "contribution_id": "C-003",
      "participant_group": "accessibility reviewers",
      "summary": "Publish notices in plain language and provide a non-visual status indicator for the review state.",
      "evidence_references": [
        "fictional-accessibility-review"
      ],
      "dissent_or_minority_report": false,
      "disposition": "accepted",
      "disposition_reason": "The request removed an access barrier without expanding authority.",
      "resulting_change": "Notice copy and status markup were revised.",
      "response_owner": "Interface maintainer"
    },
    {
      "contribution_id": "C-004",
      "participant_group": "minority report",
      "summary": "Do not deploy any automated visibility limitation, even temporarily.",
      "evidence_references": [
        "fictional-minority-report"
      ],
      "dissent_or_minority_report": true,
      "disposition": "rejected",
      "disposition_reason": "The working group retained a narrowly scoped temporary action for immediate personal-data exposure, but preserved the objection and required human renewal.",
      "resulting_change": "No full prohibition; the dissent is published and the safeguard was tightened.",
      "response_owner": "Governance working group"
    }
  ],
  "dissent_and_minority_reports": [
    "A minority report opposed all automated visibility limits and requested a human-only process."
  ],
  "changes_made": [
    "Human approval required for permanent removal",
    "Six-hour expiry for automated temporary limits",
    "Reason code and evidence reference required",
    "Plain-language notices and accessible status added"
  ],
  "changes_not_made": [
    "The proposal to prohibit every temporary automated limit was not adopted; the reason and minority report remain visible."
  ],
  "public_response_commitment": "A disposition response is published for every in-scope contribution within the fictional review window.",
  "correction_or_appeal_path": "Participants may request correction of the participation summary or appeal a moderation action through the published human-review route.",
  "non_retaliation_statement": "Participation, criticism, refusal to participate, or withdrawal does not reduce account standing or access in this fictional example.",
  "data_use_and_retention": "Only the public disposition record and non-identifying summary are retained for the example. Raw private submissions are outside this static package.",
  "withdrawal_refusal_or_exit_path": "A participant may withdraw a private submission before disposition, refuse public attribution, or leave the process without being treated as consenting to the outcome.",
  "next_review_utc": "2026-12-19T12:41:06Z",
  "public_summary_url": "https://vnwo.com/participation/",
  "source_domain": "vnwo.com",
  "claim_boundary_note": "Fictional static example. It does not certify representation, consent, fairness, democratic legitimacy, legal sufficiency, or actual implementation behavior."
}