{
  "schema_version": "3.0.8",
  "id": "ledger-public-comment-001",
  "version": "3.0.8",
  "last_reviewed_utc": "2026-06-20T17:20:17Z",
  "artifact_maturity": "reference",
  "process_id": "process-public-comment-001",
  "process_title": "Fictional public-comment process with non-adopted requests",
  "decision_scope": "Review appeal timing, record retention, and participation access for a community policy.",
  "influence_level": "consultation",
  "decision_owner": "Example Community Board",
  "entries": [
    {
      "contribution_id": "PC-001",
      "contribution_summary": "Extend the appeal response target from 48 to 72 hours to reduce volunteer burden.",
      "source_group_or_role": "volunteer moderator group",
      "evidence_references": [
        "fictional-workload-note"
      ],
      "material_dissent": false,
      "disposition": "partially_accepted",
      "rationale": "A 72-hour default was adopted, with a 24-hour acknowledgement requirement.",
      "resulting_change_or_non_change": "Response target changed; acknowledgement requirement retained.",
      "response_owner": "Policy editor",
      "response_utc": "2026-06-20T17:20:17Z",
      "correction_status": "not_requested"
    },
    {
      "contribution_id": "PC-002",
      "contribution_summary": "Remove every record of prior moderation after an appeal succeeds.",
      "source_group_or_role": "public commenter",
      "evidence_references": [],
      "material_dissent": false,
      "disposition": "rejected",
      "rationale": "The process retained a minimal repair record to prevent repeated harm and document correction, while removing the adverse status from active decision use.",
      "resulting_change_or_non_change": "No total erasure; retention was narrowed and the corrected status is prominent.",
      "response_owner": "Records steward",
      "response_utc": "2026-06-20T17:20:17Z",
      "correction_status": "not_requested"
    },
    {
      "contribution_id": "PC-003",
      "contribution_summary": "Add a phone participation channel staffed at all hours.",
      "source_group_or_role": "accessibility commenter",
      "evidence_references": [],
      "material_dissent": false,
      "disposition": "deferred",
      "rationale": "The organization lacks staffing for 24-hour coverage; a callback and relay-compatible channel is being assessed.",
      "resulting_change_or_non_change": "No 24-hour phone line in this cycle; a documented assessment and next review date were added.",
      "response_owner": "Access coordinator",
      "response_utc": "2026-06-20T17:20:17Z",
      "correction_status": "not_requested"
    },
    {
      "contribution_id": "PC-004",
      "contribution_summary": "Use participant silence as support for the proposed rule.",
      "source_group_or_role": "anonymous comment",
      "evidence_references": [],
      "material_dissent": false,
      "disposition": "rejected",
      "rationale": "Silence is not consent, approval, or evidence of no harm.",
      "resulting_change_or_non_change": "The final report explicitly forbids this inference.",
      "response_owner": "Claim-boundary reviewer",
      "response_utc": "2026-06-20T17:20:17Z",
      "correction_status": "not_requested"
    }
  ],
  "unresolved_items": [
    "Twenty-four-hour phone coverage remains requested but unfunded."
  ],
  "dissent_report_links": [],
  "completion_notes": "All in-scope requests have a reasoned disposition. Several requests were not adopted, and the record does not describe consultation as shared authority.",
  "correction_or_appeal_path": "A correction request may challenge an inaccurate summary or missing disposition; unresolved authority or evidence conflicts route to human review.",
  "non_retaliation_statement": "Criticism, dissent, nonparticipation, or correction requests do not reduce standing in this fictional example.",
  "source_domain": "vnwo.com",
  "claim_boundary_note": "VNWO provides a static documentation pattern. It does not recruit participants, collect submissions, verify identity or representation, validate consent, certify fairness, democracy, accessibility, legal sufficiency, or implementation quality, and it does not guarantee that an institution acts on input."
}